Fly-by turn anticipation
How early to start a fly-by turn at a waypoint: turn radius, lead distance, arc length, and time in the turn, from the inbound and outbound courses, speed, and bank angle or turn rate.
Planning and education aid. Not for primary navigation. Full disclaimer
Start the right turn 833.4 m before the waypoint; the radius is 833.4 m.
- Turn radius
- Course change
- Turn direction
- Arc length
- Time in the turn
- Bank angle
Provenance
- Computed by
- navigation.route.fly-by 1.0.0, core 0.1.0
- Model
- Coordinated level turn at constant speed: R = V²/(g tan φ), lead = R tan(Δψ/2)
- Accuracy
- Exact for a steady coordinated turn in still air; wind changes the ground track
- Notes
- None
- Cites
- Federal Aviation Administration, Instrument Flying Handbook, FAA-H-8083-15B; Karney, C. F. F., Journal of Geodesy, Algorithms for geodesics
Something look off?
How we got thisFormula, worked example, sources, and proof
Model: Coordinated level turn at constant speed: R = V²/(g tan φ), lead = R tan(Δψ/2)
Accuracy: Exact for a steady coordinated turn in still air; wind changes the ground track
When to use this: Use this to know how far before a waypoint to start turning, so the aircraft rolls out on the outbound course instead of overshooting and correcting back. That lead distance is what a flight management system computes for a fly-by waypoint, and it is what a pilot hand-flying a route needs to anticipate: the sharper the turn and the faster the aircraft, the further out it begins. Give the bank angle you intend to use, or a turn rate — three degrees a second is the standard rate — and it also reports the radius, how long the turn takes, and how far it flies.
Limitations: This is still air. Wind bends the ground track, and a turn into or out of a strong wind starts and ends in different places than this says; nothing here models it. It is a level coordinated turn at constant speed, so it does not describe a climbing turn, a decelerating one, or the roll-in and roll-out, which take a second or two each and make the real lead slightly longer. It is geometry rather than procedure design: it does not know an aircraft's certified bank limits, a category's protected airspace, or what a published procedure requires, and a course change large enough that a fly-by turn would leave the protected area is flagged as better flown as a fly-over.
Worked example: A 90° fly-by at 120 kt and 25° of bank. Source: exact by hand, and tied to the FAA's published standard-rate turn: at 120 kt and 25° of bank R = V²/(g tan 25°) = 833.3860599902922 m and the lead for a 90° turn is R tan 45° = R; at the standard 3°/s instead, the radius is 1179.0198184247606 m, identical to the V·T/(2π) the two-minute definition gives, and the 90° arc is 1852.0000000000002 m — one nautical mile exactly. It is golden test vector v001, and every build checks the tool still gives its answer within its tolerance.
You enter
- Bank angle
- 25 deg
- Inbound course
- 360 deg
- Outbound course
- 090 deg
- Speed
- 120 kt
You get
- Lead distance
- 833.4 m
- Turn radius
- 833.4 m
- Course change
- 90°
- Turn direction
- right
- Arc length
- 1,309.1 m
- Time in the turn
- 21.2 s
- Bank angle
- 25°
Review: Not yet independently reviewed by a geodesist.
Last verified: 2026-09-18, when a maintainer last confirmed this tool's sources at the issuer. See the sources ledger.
Status: version 1.0.0, core 0.1.0. See this tool in the verification report.
Changes
- 2026-09-19, added: New navigation tools: rhumb lines, cross-track and along-track distance, fly-by turn anticipation, time-speed-distance with arrival times, closest point of approach, and route legs with true and magnetic courses; and the first geometry tool, polygon area on the ellipsoid. Changelog
Checked against: 23 golden test vectors (download the test vectors, each with its source and tolerance). See how results are checked and every source.
Sources
- Instrument Flying Handbook, FAA-H-8083-15B, Federal Aviation Administration, FAA-H-8083-15B. Chapter 5: the standard-rate turn, 3° per second, 360° in two minutes.
- Algorithms for geodesics, Karney, C. F. F., Journal of Geodesy, Vol. 87, No. 1. pp. 43-55.