geoprimsField-grade geospatial math

Multirotor hover power

Electrical hover power for a multirotor from its mass, rotors, and air density, by momentum theory with a figure of merit and motor efficiency, never the ideal power alone.

Planning and education aid. Not for primary navigation. Full disclaimer

Experimental: not yet fully verified. How results are checked

150.6W

Hovering takes about 150.6 W from the battery. The ideal minimum is 76.8 W.

Ideal induced power
Total disk area
Disk loading
Air density
Power factor vs sea level
Provenance
Computed by
drone.power.hover-power 1.0.0, core 0.1.0
Model
Momentum theory: P_ideal = (m·g0)^1.5 / √(2ρA); electrical P = P_ideal / (FM·η) + avionics; ISA troposphere density
Accuracy
A first estimate. Real power depends on rotor design, frame drag, and wind; calibrate FM·η from a test flight when you can.
Notes
1 shown with the answer
Cites
Leishman, J. G., Cambridge University Press, Principles of Helicopter Aerodynamics; International Civil Aviation Organization, Manual of the ICAO Standard Atmosphere, Doc 7488/3

Something look off?

Your values

Showing an example. Change anything.
More options 5
Run many at once from a CSV

Loading…

How we got thisFormula, worked example, sources, and proof

Model: Momentum theory: P_ideal = (m·g0)^1.5 / √(2ρA); electrical P = P_ideal / (FM·η) + avionics; ISA troposphere density

Accuracy: A first estimate. Real power depends on rotor design, frame drag, and wind; calibrate FM·η from a test flight when you can.

Worked example: A 1.4 kg quadcopter with 9.4 in rotors at sea level. Source: add-drone-suite hover scenario: disk area 0.1791 m², ideal 76.8 W, electrical 150.6 W. It is golden test vector v001, and every build checks the tool still gives its answer within its tolerance.

You enter

Takeoff mass
1.4 kg
Rotor diameter
9.4 in
Rotors
4

You get

Electrical hover power
150.6 W
Ideal induced power
76.8 W
Total disk area
0.1791 m²
Disk loading
76.7 Pa
Air density
1.225 kg/m³
Power factor vs sea level
1

Review: Not yet independently reviewed by a Part 107 remote pilot.

Last verified: 2026-09-18, when a maintainer last confirmed this tool's sources at the issuer. See the sources ledger.

Status: version 1.0.0, core 0.1.0. See this tool in the verification report.

Checked against: 5 golden test vectors (download the test vectors, each with its source and tolerance). See how results are checked and every source.

Sources

Experimental means this tool has not yet met the stable bar: at least 20 golden vectors, differential tests, and an independent worked example.