Legacy datum to or from WGS 84
Converts a latitude and longitude between a legacy datum (, , , Tokyo, , Pulkovo 1942, , or Arc 1960) and 84 with the published EPSG transformation, and states its accuracy, which is meters, not centimeters.
The point shifts 138.7 m toward 223°. This shift is good only to about 10 m.
- ED50 to WGS 84 by EPSG 1133 is good to about 10 m, not the centimeters of a modern frame.
- Longitude
- Horizontal shift
- Shift direction
- Stated accuracy
Provenance
- Computed by
- geodesy.datum.legacy 1.0.0, core 0.1.0
- Model
- EPSG geocentric translation or 7-parameter Helmert (geog2D domain): geographic → ECEF on the datum's ellipsoid → Helmert → WGS 84
- Accuracy
- EPSG 1133 (ED50 to WGS 84): about 10 m, for western Europe.
- Notes
- 1 shown with the answer
- Cites
- IOGP Geomatics Committee, EPSG Geodetic Parameter Dataset; International Association of Oil & Gas Producers (IOGP), Coordinate Conversions and Transformations including Formulas, IOGP Publication 373-7-2
Something look off?
How we got thisFormula, worked example, sources, and proof
Model: EPSG geocentric translation or 7-parameter Helmert (geog2D domain): geographic → ECEF on the datum's ellipsoid → Helmert → WGS 84
Accuracy: As stated by EPSG for each transformation: 2 m (OSGB36) to 35 m (Arc 1960); matches PROJ's implementation of the same EPSG operation to 1e-9°
When to use this: Use this to place an old map, chart, or survey record against a modern position. Coordinates printed before satellite positioning are on a datum fitted to one region — ED50 across western Europe, NAD27 in North America, Tokyo in Japan and Korea, Arc 1960 in east Africa — and reading them as WGS 84 puts a point tens to hundreds of meters from where it belongs, far enough to move a boundary onto the wrong side of a road. The answer reports how far the point moves and in which direction, so the size of the correction is visible, along with what the transformation is actually worth.
Limitations: This is meters of accuracy, not centimeters, and the stated figure is the point: from 2 m for OSGB36 to 35 m for Arc 1960. A single set of parameters is being asked to stand for a whole continental datum that was never that consistent, so the error varies across the region and no single number describes any particular point. Each transformation has a published area of use and the answer is flagged outside it, where it is extrapolation rather than transformation. Where a national grid exists — the NADCON5 grids for North America, OSTN15 for Great Britain — that grid is more accurate than this and should be preferred; the neighbouring NADCON5 tool covers the American cases. Only latitude and longitude are converted; heights are untouched, and nothing here concerns a vertical datum.
Worked example: Paris on ED50 to WGS 84. Source: PROJ 9.3.0 asked for EPSG:1133 (ED50 to WGS 84 (1)) by code alone, through pyproj, returns 48.85568546266484 and 2.350914333016232 — identical to the tool in every digit a double carries. It is golden test vector v001, and every build checks the tool still gives its answer within its tolerance.
You enter
- Legacy datum
- ED50
- Latitude
- 48.8566 deg
- Longitude
- 2.3522 deg
You get
- Latitude
- 48.8556855°
- Longitude
- 2.3509143°
- Horizontal shift
- 138.7 m
- Shift direction
- 223°
- Stated accuracy
- 10 m
Review: Not yet independently reviewed by a geodesist.
Last verified: 2026-09-19, when a maintainer last confirmed this tool's sources at the issuer. See the sources ledger.
Status: version 1.0.0, core 0.1.0. See this tool in the verification report.
Checked against: 20 golden test vectors (download the test vectors, each with its source and tolerance). See how results are checked and every source.
Sources
- EPSG Geodetic Parameter Dataset, IOGP Geomatics Committee, v10.094, as shipped in PROJ 9.3.0. Transformations 1108, 1122, 1133, 1173, 1267, 1305, 1314, 1864 to WGS 84.
- Coordinate Conversions and Transformations including Formulas, IOGP Publication 373-7-2, International Association of Oil & Gas Producers (IOGP), Revised September 2019. §4.2.3 Helmert 7-parameter and §4.2.5 time-dependent transformations (EPSG methods 1032, 1033, 1053, 1056).
Terms
- AGD66: Australian Geodetic Datum 1966
- A legacy Australian datum on the Australian National Spheroid. Source: EPSG Geodetic Parameter Dataset
- ED50: European Datum 1950
- A legacy European datum on the International 1924 ellipsoid. Source: EPSG Geodetic Parameter Dataset
- NAD27: North American Datum of 1927
- The older North American datum on the Clarke 1866 ellipsoid. Its positions can differ from NAD 83 by tens of meters. Source: NADCON5 datum transformations
- OSGB36: Ordnance Survey Great Britain 1936
- The legacy datum of the British National Grid, on the Airy 1830 ellipsoid. Source: EPSG Geodetic Parameter Dataset
- SAD69: South American Datum 1969
- A legacy South American datum on the GRS 1967 ellipsoid. Source: EPSG Geodetic Parameter Dataset
- WGS: World Geodetic System
- The US Department of Defense global reference frame and ellipsoid that GPS uses; the current version is WGS 84. Source: Department of Defense World Geodetic System 1984
AGD66 — Australian Geodetic Datum 1966
A legacy Australian datum on the Australian National Spheroid.
Source: EPSG Geodetic Parameter Dataset
ED50 — European Datum 1950
A legacy European datum on the International 1924 ellipsoid.
Source: EPSG Geodetic Parameter Dataset
NAD27 — North American Datum of 1927
The older North American datum on the Clarke 1866 ellipsoid. Its positions can differ from NAD 83 by tens of meters.
Source: NADCON5 datum transformations
OSGB36 — Ordnance Survey Great Britain 1936
The legacy datum of the British National Grid, on the Airy 1830 ellipsoid.
Source: EPSG Geodetic Parameter Dataset
SAD69 — South American Datum 1969
A legacy South American datum on the GRS 1967 ellipsoid.
Source: EPSG Geodetic Parameter Dataset
WGS — World Geodetic System
The US Department of Defense global reference frame and ellipsoid that GPS uses; the current version is WGS 84.
Source: Department of Defense World Geodetic System 1984
Learn the concept: NAD83 vs. WGS 84 explained